Decision-grade sustainability investment
Sustainability is a financial variable at three moments — diligence, hold, and exit. Taza reads a target's exposure and which of its product lines win or lose demand as its customers comply — scored, cited, in days.Underwrite it like the rest of the deal.
Illustrative portfolio-company read · every line cited to source
Regulation doesn't stop at the portfolio company — it cascades to its customers. As buyers come under CSRD, CBAM, and their own supplier mandates, procurement criteria shift: demand expands for the products that help customers comply, and erodes for the ones that become a liability on the customer's books. Demand Map reads that cascade line by line — so the deal team underwrites the revenue case, not just the compliance cost. It's part of Foundation+, an optional scope extension.
When a customer's mandate makes a product the compliant choice — lower-carbon inputs, traceable supply, reporting-ready materials — it shifts from optional to required. The addressable market grows as the regulation spreads across the customer base.
When a product adds compliance burden or embedded carbon cost to the customer's own books, buyers reformulate or design it out. The addressable market contracts ahead of the mandate, not after it.
A target's sustainability profile materially affects underwritten value — supply-chain exposure, transition CAPEX, carbon-cost pass-through capacity, jurisdictional penalty risk. This is not a reputational variable. It's a financial one — and it shows up at three points in the deal lifecycle.
Score the regulatory exposure and the demand shift before the deal closes — cited to source, defensible in IC.
Turn the read into a plan, then keep the record live as regulation moves through the hold period.
The next buyer underwrites against the same record — exit-ready, not assembled under pressure.
CBAM levies, CSRD reporting infrastructure, EPR fees, supplier failures cascading into revenue interruption — balance-sheet items, not disclosures.
106K+ providers indexed against 728 use cases and 12 ESG topics — the full curated field, including the opportunities you haven't found. The record compounds through hold into exit.
A scored, cited read the deal team can defend — statements, obligations, and market perception in one decision-grade view, gap-inventoried. Peer Map extends scope to a competitive set; Demand Map to the product portfolio.
Every gap becomes a scoped project, matched to named providers through a structured match. The IC gets a plan, not a list.
One command-center view across the portfolio. Each portco sees only itself; the sponsor sees everything — progress, gaps, live signal.
The engines re-run on cadence as regulation shifts. The Foundation you set compounds, it doesn't go stale.
Net Positive anchors by default, but the data layer feeds whichever framework you bring — no rip-and-replace. Your scoring, internal benchmarks, and sector frameworks flow through the same engines into one operational record.
Public sources built in. Layer proprietary scoring and house methodologies — all flowing through the same engines.
Disclosure regimes mapped across every portco. The gap inventory is live, cited, and refreshed as regulation shifts.
Science-based targets, transition planning, producer responsibility — each mapped to a provider who can close the gap.
A general model summarizes wherever you direct it — only as good as the questions you already know to ask. Taza runs a structured method over a proprietary record that compounds across every framework and engine that touches the deal: the exposure you weren't tracking, the gap behind the claim, the provider you'd never have found.
Where sustainability gets real.
Your evolving priorities. Tailored playbooks. Radical collaboration.
First reports in 5–7 days. Scored, cited, gap-inventoried. The entire deal team reads from the same record.